no, but

The answer was no, but how did they handle it?

Public profiles for closure, response time, and feedback quality. Candidates stay private.

We’ll ask you to confirm by email. No application data is collected here.

Company profile / preview Evidence reviewed

Software · 501–1,000 employees

Company 047

38candidate reports
Closure rate84%
Median response9 days
Feedback quality2.4 / 4
Feedback distribution0—4
Illustrative data · Profiles will show sample size, date range, and evidence status.
Measure communication
Protect candidates
Show the evidence

The hiring process leaves a trail.

We turn that trail into a comparable record of what happened after the application.

Illustrative report / evidence reviewed

A candidate’s response timeline

21 days total
  1. 0 daysAppliedFeb 06
  2. +5ScreenFeb 11
  3. +4InterviewFeb 15
  4. +12DecisionFeb 27

Closed, with context.The company replied after the final interview and named the deciding experience gap.

3 / 4
Comparison ledger / illustrative data

One view across companies

ClosedSilence
CompanyClosureMedian responseFeedback / 4
Company 04784%9 days2.4
Company 11852%21 days1.2
Company 20391%5 days3.1

Five states. No vague star rating.

Measures the usefulness of company communication—not candidate quality or the hiring decision.

Private message in. Public pattern out.

Illustrative private submission02.27.26
FromRedacted

Thank you for the time you invested in the interview process.

We’ve decided to move forward with a candidate whose experience more closely matches redacted private detail for this role.

Raw message · not public
Illustrative public profileIncluded in aggregate
3/ 4

Specific reason

Closure
Yes
Stage
Final interview
Response
12 days

The person disappears. The pattern remains.

Candidate names, recruiter names, and raw correspondence stay out of public profiles.

The important details.

Is no, but available now?

Not yet. no, but is in prelaunch development. Join the email list for product, pilot-research, and launch updates.

Will candidate identities or rejection emails be public?

Candidate identities won’t be shown publicly, and raw messages will remain private by default. Any future public contribution will require explicit consent and a privacy review.

Is this a place to rate recruiters or argue hiring decisions?

No. no, but measures company communication: closure, timing, specificity, and actionability. It won’t name individuals, judge candidate quality, or infer hidden rejection reasons.

Can employers pay to change their scores?

No. Public metrics won’t be directly editable or purchasable. Employers may respond, correct factual errors, and improve how they communicate with future candidates.

Help make the end of hiring visible.

Get product, pilot research, and launch updates.

We’ll ask you to confirm by email. No application data is collected here.